Facebook tracking pixelAcetabular Fracture - AI-Powered ICD-10 Documentation
S32.409A
ICD-10-CM
Acetabular Fracture

Understanding Acetabular Fracture diagnosis, treatment, and documentation? Find information on hip socket fracture ICD-10 codes, clinical evaluation, surgical approaches, and post-operative care. Learn about acetabular fracture types, classifications, and medical coding guidelines for accurate healthcare reporting. Explore resources for proper clinical documentation of acetabular fractures and related hip injuries.

Also known as

Hip Socket Fracture

Diagnosis Snapshot

Key Facts
  • Definition : Break in the hip socket (acetabulum), often caused by high-impact trauma.
  • Clinical Signs : Severe hip pain, limited range of motion, inability to bear weight, swelling, bruising.
  • Common Settings : Emergency room, trauma center, orthopedics clinic.

Related ICD-10 Code Ranges

Complete code families applicable to AAPC S32.409A Coding
S72.0-S72.9

Fracture of acetabulum

Fractures involving the hip socket.

S70-S79

Injuries to the hip and thigh

Includes various injuries to the hip and thigh region.

S00-S99

Injuries to the head, neck, and torso

Encompasses injuries to the head, neck, and torso areas.

Code-Specific Guidance

Decision Tree for

Follow this step-by-step guide to choose the correct ICD-10 code.

Is the acetabular fracture closed?

  • Yes

    Is displacement specified?

  • No

    Is displacement specified?

Code Comparison

Related Codes Comparison

When to use each related code

Description
Hip socket break.
Pelvic ring break.
Femoral neck break.

Documentation Best Practices

Documentation Checklist
  • Acetabular Fx: Document mechanism of injury
  • Hip socket Fx: Specify fracture location (anterior/posterior)
  • Acetabular Fx: Describe displacement/comminution
  • Hip socket Fx: Note associated injuries (pelvis, femur)
  • Acetabular Fx: Document neurovascular exam

Coding and Audit Risks

Common Risks
  • Laterality Coding

    Missing or incorrect laterality (right, left, bilateral) for acetabular fracture impacts reimbursement and data accuracy. ICD-10-CM coding guidelines require laterality specification.

  • Fracture Specificity

    Insufficient documentation of fracture type (e.g., displaced, comminuted, transverse) may lead to undercoding and lost revenue. CDI can improve documentation clarity.

  • Associated Injuries

    Overlooking associated injuries (e.g., femoral head fractures, nerve damage) can result in inaccurate coding, affecting DRG assignment and quality reporting. Thorough documentation is crucial.

Mitigation Tips

Best Practices
  • Accurate ICD-10 coding for Acetabular Fx: S32.-
  • Thorough documentation of fracture type/location for CDI
  • Timely orthopedic consult improves Hip Socket Fx outcomes
  • Image-guided reduction/fixation for optimal fracture healing
  • Pain management, DVT prophylaxis crucial post-op for compliance

Clinical Decision Support

Checklist
  • Confirm mechanism of injury (high-energy trauma, fall)
  • Order pelvic X-ray, Judet views for acetabular fracture visualization
  • Classify fracture using Letournel classification (anterior/posterior, column/wall)
  • Assess neurovascular status of affected limb
  • Consult orthopedics for surgical management if displaced

Reimbursement and Quality Metrics

Impact Summary
  • Acetabular Fracture (ICD-10-CM S72) reimbursement hinges on accurate coding of displacement, laterality, and associated injuries. Impacts DRG assignment and payment.
  • Coding quality for Hip Socket Fracture impacts hospital quality reporting metrics for complications like infection, DVT, and PE.
  • Accurate documentation of Acetabular Fracture treatment (ORIF, non-surgical) affects APC assignment for accurate hospital reimbursement.
  • Proper coding and documentation of Acetabular Fractures improve medical billing compliance and reduce claim denials.

Streamline Your Medical Coding

Let S10.AI help you select the most accurate ICD-10 codes. Our AI-powered assistant ensures compliance and reduces coding errors.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions and Answers

Q: What are the key clinical indicators differentiating an acetabular fracture from a hip dislocation or femoral neck fracture in a patient presenting with acute hip pain after a high-impact trauma?

A: While all three injuries present with acute hip pain following trauma, differentiating an acetabular fracture from a hip dislocation or femoral neck fracture requires careful clinical evaluation. Acetabular fractures often involve significant ecchymosis, swelling, and limited range of motion in the hip joint. However, unlike a hip dislocation, the femoral head remains within the acetabulum, though its position may be altered. Compared to a femoral neck fracture, which typically presents with external rotation of the leg, acetabular fractures may present with both internal and external rotation depending on the fracture pattern. Accurate diagnosis requires imaging. Plain radiographs can be helpful initially, but CT scans are crucial for precise characterization of the fracture pattern and are essential for surgical planning. Consider implementing a standardized trauma imaging protocol for suspected pelvic injuries to ensure appropriate imaging is obtained. Explore how advanced imaging techniques, like 3D reconstruction from CT scans, can further aid in surgical planning.

Q: How do I interpret Judet and Letournel classification of acetabular fractures and what are the implications for choosing between operative vs. non-operative management?

A: The Judet and Letournel classification categorizes acetabular fractures based on anatomical location and fracture lines, aiding in surgical planning and prognosis. This system divides fractures into five elementary and five associated types, considering both anterior and posterior column involvement. Non-operative management with protected weight-bearing might be considered for minimally displaced fractures, stable fractures, or patients with significant medical comorbidities precluding surgery. However, displaced fractures, particularly those involving articular incongruity, instability, or intra-articular fragments, often require open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to restore joint stability and prevent long-term complications like post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Learn more about the specific criteria for each classification and their implications for surgical approach and post-operative management to guide your clinical decision-making process.

Quick Tips

Practical Coding Tips
  • Code S72.0-S72.9 for acetabular fx
  • ICD-10-CM S72 specifies location
  • Document fx type for accurate coding
  • Consider laterality (left/right) code
  • Use 7th character for encounter type

Documentation Templates

Patient presents with complaints consistent with a possible acetabular fracture, also known as a hip socket fracture.  Onset of symptoms, including severe hip pain, groin pain, and limited range of motion in the affected hip, began following a [Mechanism of injury - e.g., motor vehicle accident, fall].  Physical examination reveals tenderness to palpation over the lateral hip, antalgic gait, and pain exacerbated by internal and external rotation of the hip joint.  Ecchymosis and swelling are present around the hip area.  Neurovascular examination of the lower extremity reveals [Document sensory and motor function, distal pulses].  Preliminary diagnosis of acetabular fracture is suspected.  Radiographic imaging, including plain film X-rays of the pelvis and hip, as well as a CT scan of the pelvis, is ordered to confirm the diagnosis and assess fracture classification (Letournel and Judet classification).  Differential diagnosis includes hip dislocation, femoral neck fracture, and pelvic ring fracture.  Patient is currently being managed with pain control utilizing [Pain medication prescribed].  Orthopedic consultation is requested for definitive management, which may include surgical intervention such as open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or percutaneous fixation, depending on fracture displacement and stability.  Patient education provided regarding the diagnosis, treatment options, and potential complications, including post-traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, and heterotopic ossification.  Follow-up appointment scheduled for reassessment and further management planning.