Facebook tracking pixel
K72.10
ICD-10-CM
End-Stage Liver Disease

Understanding End-Stage Liver Disease (ESLD) diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment? This resource provides essential information for healthcare professionals on ESLD, including clinical documentation, medical coding, and liver failure stages. Learn about hepatic failure symptoms, diagnostic criteria, and management of ESLD for accurate and comprehensive patient care.

Also known as

ESLD
Liver Failure
Hepatic Failure
+1 more

Diagnosis Snapshot

Key Facts
  • Definition : Advanced, irreversible liver damage causing impaired function.
  • Clinical Signs : Jaundice, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding.
  • Common Settings : Hospital ICU, transplant centers, palliative care settings.

Related ICD-10 Code Ranges

Complete code families applicable to AAPC K72.10 Coding
K70-K77

Diseases of liver

Covers various liver conditions, including cirrhosis and liver failure.

I85-I86

Portal vein disorders

Includes portal hypertension, often associated with end-stage liver disease.

I98

Other disorders of circulatory system

May include complications of liver disease affecting the circulatory system.

Code-Specific Guidance

Decision Tree for

Follow this step-by-step guide to choose the correct ICD-10 code.

Is the liver disease due to alcohol?

  • Yes

    Is there ascites?

  • No

    Is it due to Hepatitis B?

Code Comparison

Related Codes Comparison

When to use each related code

Description
Irreversible liver damage, final stage.
Scarring of the liver, affecting function.
Sudden, severe liver failure, life-threatening.

Documentation Best Practices

Documentation Checklist
  • Document ESLD etiology (alcohol, NASH, etc.)
  • Specific liver function test (LFT) results
  • MELD score if calculated
  • Evidence of decompensation (ascites, varices, encephalopathy)
  • Document treatment plan (transplant referral, supportive care)

Coding and Audit Risks

Common Risks
  • Unspecified ESLD Etiology

    Coding ESLD without documenting the underlying cause (e.g., alcohol, hepatitis) leads to inaccurate severity and reimbursement.

  • Confusing Acute/Chronic

    Miscoding acute liver failure as chronic ESLD or vice-versa impacts quality metrics and resource allocation.

  • Missing Decompensation Codes

    Failing to code ESLD complications (e.g., ascites, encephalopathy) understates patient acuity and justifies higher level care.

Mitigation Tips

Best Practices
  • Document ESLD etiology for accurate ICD-10 coding (K72.9)
  • Specify liver disease stage for HCC risk assessment and HCC coding
  • Thorough MELD score documentation for transplant eligibility
  • Monitor and document decompensation signs for timely intervention
  • Review medication reconciliation for hepatotoxic drugs

Clinical Decision Support

Checklist
  • 1. Verify MELD score documented, if applicable (ICD-10-CM K72.90)
  • 2. Confirm etiology of liver disease for accurate coding (HCC, alcohol, etc.)
  • 3. Document ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, varices for severity staging
  • 4. Check INR, bilirubin, creatinine for consistent ESLD diagnosis

Reimbursement and Quality Metrics

Impact Summary
  • End-Stage Liver Disease (ESLD) reimbursement hinges on accurate ICD-10-CM coding (K74.6), impacting MS-DRG assignment and payment.
  • ESLD coding accuracy directly affects hospital quality reporting metrics for mortality, readmissions, and complications.
  • Proper ESLD documentation and coding are crucial for appropriate resource allocation and case-mix index (CMI) accuracy.
  • Optimize ESLD reimbursement and quality scores by implementing robust coding audits and physician education programs.

Streamline Your Medical Coding

Let S10.AI help you select the most accurate ICD-10 codes for . Our AI-powered assistant ensures compliance and reduces coding errors.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions and Answers

Q: What are the key differentiating factors in diagnosing compensated vs. decompensated end-stage liver disease (ESLD) in a clinical setting?

A: Differentiating compensated vs. decompensated ESLD hinges on identifying clinical manifestations of portal hypertension and liver insufficiency. Compensated ESLD patients, despite having advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, may be asymptomatic or exhibit subtle signs like fatigue or mild splenomegaly. Lab values may show abnormalities, but patients generally maintain a reasonable quality of life. Decompensated ESLD, however, is marked by overt clinical signs such as variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or jaundice. These complications reflect a significant decline in liver function and a worsening prognosis. A thorough patient history, physical examination, including assessment for ascites and asterixis, coupled with laboratory tests (liver function tests, coagulation studies, renal function) and imaging (ultrasound, CT) are crucial for accurate staging. Explore how MELD scoring can help stratify patients with decompensated ESLD for liver transplant prioritization.

Q: How can clinicians effectively manage hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in patients with end-stage liver disease to improve quality of life and minimize hospital readmissions?

A: Managing hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in ESLD requires a multi-pronged approach. First, identify and address precipitating factors such as infections, gastrointestinal bleeding, constipation, or electrolyte imbalances. Non-absorbable disaccharides like lactulose are the mainstay of treatment, aiming to reduce ammonia production in the gut. Rifaximin, an antibiotic, can be added to lactulose therapy for patients with recurrent HE. Close monitoring of neurological status, including mental status assessments and EEG if necessary, is essential. Nutritional support with adequate protein intake, avoiding excessive dietary protein, is crucial. Patient and caregiver education on medication adherence, dietary restrictions, and early recognition of HE symptoms are vital to minimize hospital readmissions and improve quality of life. Consider implementing structured patient education programs to improve long-term HE management outcomes. Learn more about the role of specialized HE clinics in providing comprehensive care.

Quick Tips

Practical Coding Tips
  • Code ESLD K74.6
  • Document severity
  • Specify etiology
  • Check complicating factors
  • Query physician if unclear

Documentation Templates

Patient presents with symptoms consistent with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), also known as liver failure or hepatic failure.  Clinical findings indicate decompensated cirrhosis, evidenced by ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding.  The patient exhibits jaundice, pruritus, and fatigue.  Laboratory results reveal elevated bilirubin, prolonged prothrombin time (PT), decreased albumin, and elevated ammonia levels.  Imaging studies, including abdominal ultrasound and potentially a CT scan or MRI of the abdomen, may demonstrate a shrunken liver, portal hypertension, and the presence of ascites or varices.  Diagnostic paracentesis was performed to evaluate ascites for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).  The patient's Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was calculated to assess prognosis and eligibility for liver transplantation.  Treatment plan includes management of complications such as ascites with diuretics and paracentesis, hepatic encephalopathy with lactulose, and variceal bleeding with endoscopic band ligation or sclerotherapy.  Nutritional support and management of coexisting conditions are also essential.  Patient education regarding lifestyle modifications, including sodium restriction and alcohol abstinence, has been provided.  Referral to a hepatologist and transplant center for evaluation of liver transplantation is warranted. The patient's overall prognosis is guarded given the advanced stage of liver disease.  Continued monitoring of liver function, MELD score, and complications is crucial.
End-Stage Liver Disease - AI-Powered ICD-10 Documentation