Facebook tracking pixelESBL-producing E. coli Urinary Tract Infection - AI-Powered ICD-10 Documentation
N39.0
ICD-10-CM
ESBL-producing E. coli Urinary Tract Infection

Learn about ESBL-producing E. coli Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) diagnosis, including clinical documentation and medical coding for Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase E. coli UTI. This resource provides information on ESBL E. coli UTI for healthcare professionals, covering best practices for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment strategies. Find key details related to ESBL-producing E. coli in UTI cases.

Also known as

Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase E. coli UTI
ESBL E. coli UTI

Diagnosis Snapshot

Key Facts
  • Definition : Urinary tract infection caused by E. coli bacteria resistant to many common antibiotics.
  • Clinical Signs : Frequent urination, burning sensation during urination, cloudy or bloody urine, back or pelvic pain.
  • Common Settings : Community-acquired, hospital-acquired, nursing homes, catheter-associated.

Related ICD-10 Code Ranges

Complete code families applicable to AAPC N39.0 Coding
N88

Other specified noninflammatory disorders of female genital tract

Includes other specified noninflammatory disorders of the female genital organs.

B96

Other bacterial agents as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere

Covers E. coli as cause of diseases classified elsewhere.

N00-N99

Diseases of the genitourinary system

Encompasses various urinary tract infections and related conditions.

Code-Specific Guidance

Decision Tree for

Follow this step-by-step guide to choose the correct ICD-10 code.

Is UTI confirmed?

  • Yes

    Is E. coli identified?

  • No

    Do not code UTI. Investigate other diagnoses.

Code Comparison

Related Codes Comparison

When to use each related code

Description
E. coli UTI resistant to some penicillins and cephalosporins.
Uncomplicated UTI caused by E. coli.
Complicated UTI due to E. coli.

Documentation Best Practices

Documentation Checklist
  • Document positive urine culture for E. coli.
  • Specify ESBL production (e.g., lab report).
  • Note UTI symptoms (dysuria, frequency, urgency).
  • Mention antibiotic susceptibility testing results.
  • Consider documenting patient risk factors (e.g., recent antibiotic use).

Coding and Audit Risks

Common Risks
  • Unspecified ESBL

    Coding lacks specificity if ESBL type (e.g., CTX-M, SHV, TEM) is not documented and coded when available.

  • UTI Site Miscoding

    Incorrect coding of UTI site (e.g., cystitis, pyelonephritis) can impact severity and reimbursement.

  • Missing Resistance Doc

    Lack of documentation confirming ESBL production (e.g., lab results) leads to coding and billing errors.

Mitigation Tips

Best Practices
  • Confirm ESBL production with lab tests (MIC, ESBL assays). Code accurately (ICD-10, SNOMED CT).
  • Avoid unnecessary antibiotics. Document antibiotic choice rationale, following local guidelines.
  • Prescribe carbapenems, cephamycins, or other ESBL-active agents based on susceptibility.
  • Enforce infection control measures (hand hygiene, contact precautions) to prevent spread.
  • Monitor patient response to therapy and adjust treatment as needed. Document thoroughly for CDI.

Clinical Decision Support

Checklist
  • Verify urine culture confirms E. coli.
  • Check ESBL production via lab testing (e.g., MIC, ESBL confirmatory test).
  • Review patient allergy information for beta-lactam hypersensitivity.
  • Document ESBL-producing E. coli UTI diagnosis (ICD-10-CM: N39.0, B96.5).
  • Consider carbapenem or other appropriate antibiotic based on susceptibility.

Reimbursement and Quality Metrics

Impact Summary
  • **Reimbursement:** Increased risk of denial if ESBL production not documented. Proper ICD-10-CM (e.g., N81.0) and CPT coding crucial for accurate reimbursement. Consider antibiotic susceptibility testing impact.
  • **Quality Metrics:** ESBL UTI impacts hospital-acquired infection (HAI) reporting. Accurate diagnosis and coding affect publicly reported quality data and potential penalties.
  • **Coding Accuracy:** Specificity in documentation required for appropriate coding. Distinguish from uncomplicated UTI for accurate severity reflection and MS-DRG assignment.
  • **Hospital Reporting:** Impacts antimicrobial stewardship program reporting. Accurate ESBL E. coli UTI data crucial for tracking resistance and optimizing treatment strategies.

Streamline Your Medical Coding

Let S10.AI help you select the most accurate ICD-10 codes for . Our AI-powered assistant ensures compliance and reduces coding errors.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions and Answers

Q: What are the recommended first-line empiric antibiotic treatment options for suspected ESBL-producing E. coli UTI in hospitalized patients with risk factors for resistance?

A: Empiric treatment for suspected ESBL-producing E. coli UTI in hospitalized patients, especially those with risk factors like recent antibiotic use, healthcare-associated infection, or travel to endemic areas, should consider agents with activity against ESBLs. Options may include carbapenems (e.g., ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem) or newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (e.g., ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam). However, local resistance patterns and patient-specific factors like allergies and renal function must guide antibiotic selection. Definitive therapy should be narrowed based on culture and susceptibility testing. Explore how antibiotic stewardship programs can optimize ESBL UTI management to minimize resistance development.

Q: How do I differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated ESBL E. coli UTI in a clinical setting, and how does this distinction impact treatment decisions?

A: Differentiating between uncomplicated and complicated ESBL E. coli UTI relies on assessing patient-specific factors. Uncomplicated UTIs typically occur in healthy, non-pregnant women without structural or functional urinary tract abnormalities. Complicated UTIs involve factors like male gender, pregnancy, urinary obstruction, indwelling catheters, renal impairment, or diabetes. This distinction is crucial for treatment decisions. Uncomplicated ESBL UTIs might be managed with oral antibiotics like nitrofurantoin (if susceptible) or fosfomycin, while complicated UTIs often require parenteral therapy with carbapenems or other ESBL-active agents for a longer duration. Consider implementing standardized diagnostic and treatment pathways for ESBL UTIs in your practice setting.

Quick Tips

Practical Coding Tips
  • Code N39.0 for UTI
  • Document ESBL confirmation
  • Consider R65.21 if sepsis
  • Query MD for E. coli specifics
  • Use additional Z codes if needed

Documentation Templates

Patient presents with symptoms consistent with a urinary tract infection (UTI), including dysuria, frequency, urgency, and suprapubic pain.  Urinalysis reveals pyuria and bacteriuria.  Urine culture confirms the presence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli (E. coli).  This ESBL E. coli UTI diagnosis is based on laboratory findings demonstrating resistance to commonly used antibiotics such as ceftriaxone and ceftazidime.  Patient's medical history is significant for [insert relevant past medical history, e.g., recent antibiotic use, recurrent UTIs, comorbidities].  Physical examination reveals [insert relevant physical exam findings, e.g., costovertebral angle tenderness, fever].  Differential diagnoses considered included uncomplicated UTI, pyelonephritis, and other bacterial infections.  Treatment plan includes [insert specific antibiotic based on susceptibility testing, e.g., carbapenem, fosfomycin] and patient education regarding antibiotic compliance, hydration, and follow-up urine culture.  ICD-10 code N39.0 (Urinary tract infection, site not specified) and appropriate resistant organism code will be used for billing and coding purposes.  Patient advised to return if symptoms worsen or do not improve within [specified timeframe].  Monitoring for potential complications such as urosepsis and acute kidney injury will be conducted.