Facebook tracking pixel
Z71.2
ICD-10-CM
Lab Results Review

Get instant clarity on your lab results review. We decode complex medical coding terms, clinical documentation, and healthcare data, providing easy-to-understand explanations of your diagnosis. Find information on abnormal lab values, diagnostic tests, and health metrics related to your condition. Understand your healthcare journey with comprehensive and accessible lab results analysis.

Also known as

Laboratory Results Analysis
Clinical Lab Evaluation

Related ICD-10 Code Ranges

Complete code families applicable to AAPC Z71.2 Coding
R70-R79

Abnormal findings on examination

Covers nonspecific abnormal lab results found during examination.

R80-R89

Abnormal findings of function studies

Includes abnormal results from various functional tests and analyses.

Z00-Z13

Encounters for examinations

Encompasses routine check-ups where lab tests may be reviewed.

Z71-Z99

Persons encountering health services

Includes follow-up encounters for review of prior lab test results.

Code-Specific Guidance

Decision Tree for

Follow this step-by-step guide to choose the correct ICD-10 code.

Is review for abnormal results?

  • Yes

    Is condition active?

  • No

    Routine health screening?

Code Comparison

Related Codes Comparison

When to use each related code

Description
Lab Results Review
Abnormal Lab Value
Hyperlipidemia

Documentation Best Practices

Documentation Checklist
  • Lab results reviewed, findings documented
  • Abnormal results addressed and correlated
  • Clinical significance of results explained
  • Diagnosis supported by lab results specified
  • ICD-10 and CPT codes compliant, justified

Coding and Audit Risks

Common Risks
  • Unconfirmed Diagnosis

    Lack of documentation linking lab results to a definitive diagnosis, impacting accurate ICD-10 coding and reimbursement.

  • Unspecified Lab Codes

    Using unspecified lab procedure codes when more specific LOINC codes are available, leading to claim denials and lost revenue.

  • Missing Documentation

    Insufficient physician documentation of lab result review, hindering accurate CDI queries and compliance audits for medical necessity.

Mitigation Tips

Best Practices
  • Ensure accurate ICD-10-CM, CPT coding for lab tests.
  • Validate medical necessity of tests via clinical documentation.
  • Standardize lab test ordering with clear CDI guidelines.
  • Timely review abnormal results, update patient charts.
  • Regular compliance audits for lab coding and billing.

Clinical Decision Support

Checklist
  • Review critical lab values: Document action.
  • Check result trends: Correlate with patient status.
  • Verify accuracy: Compare prior results, patient context.
  • Confirm appropriate testing: Diagnosis, treatment plan alignment.
  • Reconcile discrepancies: Investigate abnormal findings, document.

Reimbursement and Quality Metrics

Impact Summary
  • Lab Results Review: optimizing medical billing and coding accuracy for improved hospital reporting.
  • Impact: Reduced claim denials, increased reimbursement rates.
  • Impact: Enhanced coding compliance, minimized audit risks.
  • Impact: Improved data quality for accurate hospital quality metrics.

Streamline Your Medical Coding

Let S10.AI help you select the most accurate ICD-10 codes. Our AI-powered assistant ensures compliance and reduces coding errors.

Quick Tips

Practical Coding Tips
  • Code confirmed diagnoses
  • Document all lab findings
  • Validate CPT codes with ICD-10
  • Use specific modifiers
  • Query physician for clarity

Documentation Templates

Lab results review performed for abnormal blood glucose levels.  Patient presented with symptoms including polyuria, polydipsia, and polyphagia.  Fasting blood glucose was elevated at 132 mgdL, confirming the suspected diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2.  Hemoglobin A1c was measured at 7.5%, indicating suboptimal glycemic control.  Lipid panel revealed elevated triglycerides at 210 mgdL and low HDL cholesterol at 35 mgdL, increasing cardiovascular risk.  Basic metabolic panel showed normal electrolyte levels and kidney function.  Urinalysis was negative for ketones and protein.  Based on these laboratory findings, the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus is confirmed.  Patient education was provided regarding lifestyle modifications, including diet and exercise.  Metformin therapy initiated at 500 mg twice daily, with plans to titrate dose based on subsequent blood glucose monitoring.  Follow-up appointment scheduled in two weeks to reassess glycemic control and adjust treatment plan as needed.  Differential diagnoses considered included type 1 diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes, but were ruled out based on patient history, physical examination, and laboratory results.  ICD-10 code E11.9 for type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications assigned.
Lab Results Review - AI-Powered ICD-10 Documentation