Find information on Watchman device leak diagnosis, including clinical documentation, medical coding, and healthcare implications. Learn about identifying, documenting, and coding a leak in a Watchman left atrial appendage closure device. This resource provides guidance for physicians, coders, and other healthcare professionals on proper terminology and coding practices related to Watchman leak detection and management. Explore relevant medical terms, diagnostic criteria, and procedural codes for accurate and efficient healthcare documentation and billing.
Also known as
Complications of surgical procedures
Covers complications following surgical procedures, including device-related issues.
Other diseases of circulatory system
Includes complications related to the circulatory system, which the Watchman impacts.
Presence of other specified aftercare codes
May be used if the leak is a long-term complication requiring ongoing care.
Follow this step-by-step guide to choose the correct ICD-10 code.
Is the leak causing pericardial effusion?
Yes
Is the effusion causing tamponade?
No
Is there any other complication?
When to use each related code
Description |
---|
Leak in Watchman Device |
LAA Occluder Thrombosis |
LAA Occluder Embolization |
Incorrect code assignment for device lead malfunction vs. intended leak design. Impacts data accuracy and reimbursement.
Lack of documentation clarifying leak location (e.g., device vs. access site) affects coding precision and quality metrics.
Distinguishing expected device performance vs. true complication impacts appropriate coding, CDI queries, and compliance.
Patient presents with suspected leak in Watchman device. Presenting symptoms include [Specify symptoms, e.g., dyspnea, palpitations, signs of stroke or systemic embolism, chest pain, lightheadedness]. Onset of symptoms occurred [Specify timeframe, e.g., gradually over the past week, acutely two hours prior to arrival]. Patient's medical history significant for atrial fibrillation, for which the Watchman left atrial appendage closure device was implanted on [Date of implantation]. Previous echocardiograms demonstrated successful LAA occlusion with no evidence of peridevice leak. Current transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) reveals [Specify TEE findings, e.g., peridevice leak measuring X mm, flow across the device into the left atrial appendage]. Differential diagnosis includes residual leak, device embolization, and thrombus formation within the LAA. Given the TEE findings, the diagnosis of Watchman device leak is made. Treatment plan includes [Specify treatment plan, e.g., anticoagulation management with [Medication and dosage], consideration for percutaneous closure of the leak, surgical intervention, continued monitoring with repeat TEE]. Risks and benefits of each treatment option were discussed with the patient. Patient understands and agrees with the plan. ICD-10 code T82.898A (Mechanical complication of other internal prosthetic devices, implants and grafts) and CPT code [Specify appropriate CPT code if applicable, e.g., 93313 for TEE] are considered appropriate for this encounter. Follow-up scheduled in [Timeframe] to reassess symptoms and evaluate treatment efficacy.