Facebook tracking pixel
Z98.89
ICD-10-CM
Presence of Watchman Device

Find comprehensive information on documenting and coding the diagnosis of Presence of Watchman Device. This guide covers relevant healthcare, clinical documentation, and medical coding terms including LAA closure, left atrial appendage occlusion, Watchman implant, ICD-10 code for Watchman device, and CPT code for Watchman procedure. Learn about proper medical record documentation for patients with a Watchman device and ensure accurate coding for reimbursement.

Also known as

Watchman Implant
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device

Diagnosis Snapshot

Key Facts
  • Definition : Implanted device in the left atrial appendage to prevent blood clots.
  • Clinical Signs : Typically asymptomatic. Device confirmed by imaging (CXR, CT, Echo).
  • Common Settings : Outpatient cardiology clinic, hospital post-implantation.

Related ICD-10 Code Ranges

Complete code families applicable to AAPC Z98.89 Coding
Z95-Z99

Presence of foreign body

Codes for presence of various internal prosthetic devices and implants.

I50-I52

Heart failure

Watchman is used in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with risk of stroke.

I48

Atrial fibrillation and flutter

The Watchman device is specifically designed for patients with this condition.

Code-Specific Guidance

Decision Tree for

Follow this step-by-step guide to choose the correct ICD-10 code.

Is the Watchman device currently in place and functioning?

  • Yes

    Any complications?

  • No

    Was it removed?

Code Comparison

Related Codes Comparison

When to use each related code

Description
Watchman Device Present
LAA Occlusion, Non-Watchman
No LAA Occlusion Device

Documentation Best Practices

Documentation Checklist
  • Watchman device implant date
  • Device type and model documented
  • Confirmation of device placement (e.g., imaging)
  • Indication for Watchman implantation
  • Current device function status

Coding and Audit Risks

Common Risks
  • Unspecified Device Type

    Coding lacks specificity, failing to capture the exact Watchman model (e.g., FLX, LAAC). Impacts data accuracy and reimbursement.

  • Implant vs. Removal

    Documentation ambiguity leads to incorrect coding for device placement or removal. Causes claims errors and compliance issues.

  • Missing Complication Codes

    Failure to code device-related complications (e.g., perforation, thrombosis) understates patient acuity and resource utilization.

Mitigation Tips

Best Practices
  • Document device type/model, implant date, and indication.
  • Query physician for clarification if documentation is unclear.
  • Code Z98.81 for presence of Watchman device.
  • Ensure proper ICD-10-PCS coding for implantation procedure.
  • Educate staff on accurate Watchman device documentation/coding.

Clinical Decision Support

Checklist
  • Confirm LAA occlusion indication documented (e.g., NVAF, CHADS2 score).
  • Verify Watchman implant procedure note in record.
  • Check post-implant imaging (e.g., TEE) confirms device placement.
  • Document device type and size in record.
  • Ensure proper ICD-10 code for Watchman device (e.g., 02HK3JZ)

Reimbursement and Quality Metrics

Impact Summary
  • Watchman Device, ICD-10-PCS Z98.8, accurate coding impacts appropriate DRG assignment and reimbursement.
  • Correct Watchman coding (Z98.8) prevents claim denials, optimizing revenue cycle management.
  • Accurate Watchman device documentation impacts quality reporting metrics for LAA closure procedures.
  • Proper Watchman coding (Z98.8) ensures data integrity for hospital quality dashboards and performance analysis.

Streamline Your Medical Coding

Let S10.AI help you select the most accurate ICD-10 codes. Our AI-powered assistant ensures compliance and reduces coding errors.

Quick Tips

Practical Coding Tips
  • Verify LAA occlusion documentation
  • Code Z98.81 for device presence
  • Confirm procedure code for implant
  • Check documentation for complications
  • Query physician if unclear

Documentation Templates

Patient presents for routine follow-up with a history of left atrial appendage closure using the Watchman device.  The procedure was performed on [Date of Procedure] due to non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2-VASc score of [Score] indicating a high risk of stroke.  Patient is currently asymptomatic and tolerating anticoagulation well, although prior to Watchman implantation, the patient experienced [Reason for discontinuation of oral anticoagulation - e.g.,  gastrointestinal bleeding or intolerance].  Physical examination is unremarkable with stable vital signs.  Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) performed on [Date of TEE] confirms stable position of the Watchman device within the left atrial appendage with no evidence of peridevice leak, thrombus formation, or device embolization.  Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is estimated at [LVEF Percentage].  Current medications include [List Medications].  Patient reports compliance with medication regimen.  Plan is to continue current medications and schedule follow-up TEE in [Timeframe - e.g., 6 months or 1 year] to monitor device function and rule out complications.  Patient education provided regarding signs and symptoms of potential complications, including device migration, thrombosis, and pericardial effusion.  Patient understands the importance of ongoing monitoring and follow-up.
Presence of Watchman Device - AI-Powered ICD-10 Documentation