Facebook tracking pixelSevere Mitral Regurgitation - AI-Powered ICD-10 Documentation
I34.0
ICD-10-CM
Severe Mitral Regurgitation

Find comprehensive information on severe mitral regurgitation, including clinical documentation requirements, ICD-10 codes (I34.0, I34.1, I35.2), medical coding guidelines, and echocardiography findings. Learn about the symptoms, causes, and treatment options for severe MR, and understand the role of healthcare professionals in diagnosis and management. Explore resources for accurate medical record keeping and compliant coding practices related to this cardiac condition.

Also known as

Severe MR
Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Diagnosis Snapshot

Key Facts
  • Definition : Leakage of blood backward through the mitral valve of the heart.
  • Clinical Signs : Shortness of breath, fatigue, swollen feet or ankles, heart murmur.
  • Common Settings : Cardiology clinic, echocardiography lab, hospital heart failure clinic.

Related ICD-10 Code Ranges

Complete code families applicable to AAPC I34.0 Coding
I05-I09

Rheumatic heart diseases

Covers rheumatic mitral valve disorders, including regurgitation.

I33-I39

Other forms of heart disease

Includes non-rheumatic mitral regurgitation due to various causes.

Q20-Q28

Congenital malformations of heart

May be relevant if regurgitation is due to a congenital heart defect.

Code-Specific Guidance

Decision Tree for

Follow this step-by-step guide to choose the correct ICD-10 code.

Is the mitral regurgitation acute?

  • Yes

    Due to endocarditis?

  • No

    Rheumatic?

Code Comparison

Related Codes Comparison

When to use each related code

Description
Severe mitral regurgitation
Moderate mitral regurgitation
Mitral valve prolapse

Documentation Best Practices

Documentation Checklist
  • Document regurgitation severity (mild, moderate, severe)
  • Quantify mitral regurgitation using echo findings (e.g., vena contracta width, effective regurgitant orifice area)
  • Specify cause of mitral regurgitation (e.g., mitral valve prolapse, rheumatic heart disease)
  • Document left ventricular size and function
  • Document associated symptoms (e.g., dyspnea, fatigue)

Coding and Audit Risks

Common Risks
  • Unspecified Etiology

    Coding MR without specifying cause (rheumatic, degenerative, etc.) leads to inaccurate severity and DRG assignment. Impacts quality reporting and reimbursement.

  • Severity Mismatch

    Documentation lacking specific details (e.g., jet size, LV function) can cause downcoding from severe MR, impacting reimbursement and quality metrics.

  • Acute vs. Chronic

    Failing to distinguish acute from chronic MR can lead to incorrect coding and inaccurate reflection of patient acuity and resource utilization.

Mitigation Tips

Best Practices
  • Document jet size/vena contracta for accurate MR severity coding (ICD-10 I05.1)
  • Thorough echo report with LA/LV size crucial for CDI of MR (I50.9)
  • Regular follow-up echoes improve MR progression tracking, optimize care
  • Integrate quantitative measures (EROA, regurgitant volume) for precise MR staging
  • Correlate echo findings with clinical symptoms for compliant MR management

Clinical Decision Support

Checklist
  • 1. Echo confirms severe MR: vena contracta, effective regurgitant orifice area?
  • 2. LVEF <60% or LVESD >40mm documented? NYHA Class?
  • 3. Symptoms of dyspnea, fatigue, or decreased exercise tolerance noted?
  • 4. Comorbidities (A-fib, pulmonary HTN) impacting surgical risk assessed?

Reimbursement and Quality Metrics

Impact Summary
  • Mitral regurgitation reimbursement impacts DRG assignment, affecting hospital payments. Coding accuracy crucial for maximizing reimbursement.
  • Severe mitral regurgitation diagnosis impacts quality metrics like readmission rates, mortality, and patient-reported outcomes.
  • Accurate coding and documentation of mitral valve procedures and complications are essential for appropriate reimbursement and quality reporting.
  • Optimize mitral regurgitation coding with ICD-10 I05.1, I34.0 for accurate reimbursement and quality data reflection.

Streamline Your Medical Coding

Let S10.AI help you select the most accurate ICD-10 codes for . Our AI-powered assistant ensures compliance and reduces coding errors.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions and Answers

Q: What are the most effective evidence-based management strategies for severe mitral regurgitation in asymptomatic patients with preserved ejection fraction?

A: Managing asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) with preserved ejection fraction (EF) requires a nuanced approach grounded in current guidelines and patient-specific factors. While traditionally watchful waiting was the norm, recent studies like the COAPT trial highlight the benefits of early intervention in select asymptomatic patients. Key management strategies include: 1. Regular monitoring: Echocardiography with comprehensive assessment of LV and LA size and function every 6-12 months is crucial to track disease progression. 2. Lifestyle modifications: Managing comorbidities like hypertension and atrial fibrillation is essential. 3. Pharmacological therapy: While no specific medication targets MR directly, managing heart failure symptoms and associated conditions with appropriate medications (e.g., ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers) is important. 4. Consideration of mitral valve intervention: For asymptomatic patients meeting specific criteria (e.g., progressive left ventricular enlargement, new-onset atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension), early mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) may be beneficial. Decision-making requires careful evaluation of individual patient characteristics and shared decision-making with the patient. Explore how the latest guidelines from organizations like the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association inform individualized management strategies for this patient population. Consider implementing a structured follow-up protocol for asymptomatic patients with severe MR to ensure timely intervention when indicated.

Q: How can I differentiate between primary (degenerative) and secondary (functional) mitral regurgitation using echocardiography, and what are the key implications for treatment decisions?

A: Distinguishing between primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is critical as it significantly influences treatment strategies. Echocardiography plays a central role in this differentiation. Key echocardiographic features suggestive of primary MR include: 1. Myxomatous degeneration or prolapse of mitral valve leaflets. 2. Thickened leaflets. 3. Chordal rupture or elongation. In contrast, secondary MR is characterized by: 1. Normal leaflet motion. 2. Dilated left ventricle. 3. Altered leaflet tethering geometry due to left ventricular remodeling, often seen in ischemic cardiomyopathy or dilated cardiomyopathy. Treatment implications differ considerably. Primary MR is often best managed with surgical or transcatheter mitral valve repair/replacement, while secondary MR treatment primarily focuses on optimizing medical therapy for the underlying cardiac condition, such as heart failure management. Mitral valve intervention for secondary MR is generally reserved for patients who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Learn more about the specific echocardiographic parameters used to assess leaflet morphology, ventricular size and function, and the impact of these findings on treatment decisions in both primary and secondary MR.

Quick Tips

Practical Coding Tips
  • Code I05.1 for rheumatic MR
  • I34.0 for nonrheumatic MR
  • Document jet severity, LV size
  • Specify cause, e.g., MVP, IE
  • Add NYHA class for symptom severity

Documentation Templates

Patient presents with symptoms suggestive of severe mitral regurgitation.  Presenting complaints include progressively worsening dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, and fatigue.  Physical examination reveals a holosystolic murmur heard best at the apex, radiating to the axilla, with a palpable thrill.  Jugular venous distension and peripheral edema are also noted.  The patient reports a history of rheumatic heart disease, a known risk factor for mitral valve dysfunction.  Echocardiography confirms severe mitral regurgitation, demonstrating a large regurgitant jet, left atrial enlargement, and left ventricular dilation.  Left ventricular ejection fraction is currently preserved at 60%.  The patient is diagnosed with severe mitral regurgitation (primary, secondary, or unspecified as determined by further evaluation).  Differential diagnoses considered include aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis, and other causes of heart failure.  Treatment plan includes optimal medical therapy with diuretics and vasodilators to manage heart failure symptoms.  Surgical intervention, including mitral valve repair or replacement, is being considered and will be discussed with the patient.  Referral to a cardiothoracic surgeon is scheduled.  The patient's condition is being closely monitored for progression of symptoms and decline in cardiac function.  ICD-10 code I05.1 (mitral regurgitation) is applied.  Medical billing codes for evaluation and management, echocardiography, and other relevant services will be documented accordingly. Future assessments will focus on symptom management, optimization of medical therapy, and evaluation for surgical intervention.