The Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language-Second Edition (CASL-2) is a standardized, norm-referenced test designed to evaluate oral language skills in individuals aged 3–21 years. This assessment provides an in-depth analysis of spoken language abilities across four key structural categories, making it an essential tool for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) conducting comprehensive language evaluations.
Research demonstrates that the CASL-2's systematic approach improves diagnostic accuracy by up to 35% compared to informal assessment methods. Its 14 individual subtests can be administered independently or in combination, allowing SLPs to tailor evaluations to specific clinical questions while maintaining standardized scoring and interpretation protocols.
SLPs rely on the CASL-2 to:
The assessment’s comprehensive scope is particularly valuable for distinguishing between different types of language impairments and tracking developmental progress over time.
The CASL-2 framework organizes spoken language evaluation into four distinct structural categories, each targeting specific aspects of language knowledge and use. This systematic approach ensures comprehensive assessment while providing clear diagnostic information for treatment planning.
1. Lexical/Semantic (Word Knowledge and Use)
This category evaluates vocabulary knowledge, word relationships, and semantic understanding across both receptive and expressive domains. Lexical/semantic skills form the foundation for complex language use and academic success.
Assessed abilities include:
2. Syntactic (Grammar Knowledge and Use)
The syntactic category assesses understanding and production of grammatical structures, including morphology, sentence formation, and complex grammatical relationships.
Assessed abilities include:
3. Supralinguistic (Higher-Order Language Skills)
This category evaluates language abilities that require integration of multiple linguistic components and higher-order thinking skills for meaning derivation.
Assessed abilities include:
4. Pragmatic (Social Language Use)
The pragmatic category assesses appropriate language use across social contexts and the ability to modify communication based on situational demands.
Assessed abilities include:
Each CASL-2 subtest provides specific diagnostic information while contributing to overall language proficiency assessment. Understanding individual subtest purposes enables SLPs to make informed decisions about assessment battery selection.
CASL-2 interpretation requires understanding both individual subtest performance and composite score patterns to make accurate diagnostic determinations and treatment recommendations.
CASL-2 Interpretation Framework:
Score Ranges and Clinical Significance:
Diagnostic Considerations:
Successful CASL-2 administration requires understanding testing procedures, environmental considerations, and integration with comprehensive language evaluation protocols.
CASL-2 to Intervention Planning:
Identified Deficit: Low Receptive Vocabulary (Subtest 1)
Intervention Focus:
Identified Deficit: Poor Inferential Skills (Subtest 12)
Intervention Focus:
Identified Deficit: Pragmatic Language Difficulties (Subtest 14)
Intervention Focus:
Modern technology solutions can improve CASL-2 administration efficiency, scoring accuracy, and intervention development while maintaining standardized testing protocols.
S10.AI provides comprehensive CASL-2 assessment solutions that integrate standardized administration protocols with advanced analysis features to support both diagnostic accuracy and intervention effectiveness.
CASL-2 Assessment Planning Template
Client Information:
Name: _________________ DOB: _______ Age: _______
Referral Date: _______ Examiner: _______________
Referral Questions: ____________________________
Pre-Assessment Considerations:
Language Background: ___________________________
Educational History: __________________________
Previous Assessments: __________________________
Cultural Factors: ______________________________
Attention/Behavioral Factors: __________________
Subtest Selection Rationale:
Administration Notes:
Testing Environment: ____________________________
Behavioral Observations: _______________________
Modifications Used: ____________________________
Validity Concerns: _____________________________
Results Summary:
Subtest Results:
Index Scores:
Clinical Interpretation:
Strengths Identified: ___________________________
Areas of Concern: ______________________________
Diagnostic Impressions: _______________________
Recommendations: _______________________________
Intervention Planning:
Priority Treatment Areas:
Specific Goals:
Treatment Approaches:
Follow-Up Planning:
Progress monitoring schedule: ___________________
Re-assessment timeline: _______________________
Team communication plan: ______________________
Effective CASL-2 utilization requires systematic administration procedures, comprehensive result interpretation, and evidence-based intervention integration. SLPs who maintain structured assessment approaches report improved diagnostic accuracy, enhanced treatment outcomes, and stronger interdisciplinary collaboration.
Key success factors include:
Consider implementing AI-enhanced assessment platforms like S10.AI to optimize your CASL-2 evaluation process while maintaining the clinical rigor essential for accurate language disorder identification and effective treatment planning.
How can I select the most informative CASL-2 subtests to differentiate between receptive, expressive, and pragmatic language deficits in a school-aged child?
When assessing a school-aged child with suspected language deficits, a targeted selection of CASL-2 subtests can provide clear diagnostic insights. To evaluate receptive language, consider administering "Sentence Comprehension" and "Receptive Vocabulary" to assess understanding of grammar and words. For expressive language difficulties, the "Sentence Expression" and "Expressive Vocabulary" subtests are crucial for evaluating how a child formulates sentences and retrieves words. To investigate pragmatic challenges, especially those seen in children with autism, the "Pragmatic Judgment" subtest offers valuable information about their understanding of social language rules. By analyzing the patterns of scores across these specific subtests, you can create a more precise and effective therapy plan. Explore how integrating these targeted assessments can sharpen your diagnostic accuracy and lead to more personalized interventions.
What are the clinical implications if a student scores low on the CASL-2 Supralinguistic subtests like "Non-literal Language" and "Inference," even with average core language scores?
Low scores on the CASL-2 Supralinguistic subtests, such as "Non-literal Language," "Inference," and "Double Meaning," in the presence of average core language skills, often indicate challenges with higher-level language processing. This profile is common in students who struggle with social communication, reading comprehension, and understanding classroom discourse. Clinically, this suggests the student can understand the literal meaning of words and sentences but has difficulty interpreting context, humor, sarcasm, and making predictions. Therapy should therefore target these specific skills through activities like analyzing ambiguous sentences, discussing character perspectives in stories, and practicing social scenarios. Consider implementing goals that focus on improving language comprehension in context to better support academic and social success.
When should I choose the CASL-2 over the OWLS-II for a comprehensive language evaluation?
The choice between the CASL-2 and the OWLS-II depends on the specific referral concerns and the depth of information required about spoken language. While both are excellent assessments, the CASL-2 is uniquely designed to provide a more in-depth and comprehensive assessment of a client's spoken language skills, with 14 separate subtests covering lexical/semantic, syntactic, supralinguistic, and pragmatic domains. The OWLS-II, on the other hand, provides a broader snapshot of both oral and written language. If the primary concern is a suspected spoken language disorder and you need to deeply analyze specific areas like pragmatic judgment or non-literal language, the CASL-2 is the more powerful diagnostic tool. Learn more about how the CASL-2's detailed subtests can help you pinpoint specific areas of difficulty in spoken language for more effective treatment planning.
Hey, we're s10.ai. We're determined to make healthcare professionals more efficient. Take our Practice Efficiency Assessment to see how much time your practice could save. Our only question is, will it be your practice?
We help practices save hours every week with smart automation and medical reference tools.
+200 Specialists
Employees4 Countries
Operating across the US, UK, Canada and AustraliaWe work with leading healthcare organizations and global enterprises.